 |
 |
Planning Initiative
SPAR Administration |
Points of Contact
- Point of Contact for Administration of SPAR Web Site:
Austin Tate (a.tate@ed.ac.uk).
- Point of Contact for Administration of E-Mail Aliases:
Bill Swartout (swartout.isi.edu).
E-mail Aliases and Members
SPAR Project Processes
SPAR Panel Document Review Process and Issue Raising
- When each SPAR Request for Comment document is released, you will
be notified by e-mail to spar-all@isi.edu.
- You are asked to review it, especially taking into account your
panel remit or specialism and to submit your reviews by e-mail to
spar-core@isi.edu.
In order to provide some structure to the reviews, and to allow the
work you do to potentially have an impact on future revisions of SPAR,
please use the following guidelines for reporting the results of your
review:
- You should note that all SPAR reviews and communications will be
made public, so please bear that in mind when making your responses.
By making a response you are agreeing that the response text and any
attached digrams may be used without constraint in a non-exclusive way
by incorporation into future revisions of the SPAR document and
publications relating to SPAR.
- To handle the communications more effectively, the SPAR Core group
request that you responses be in the form of "issues".
The issues can be reported on a proforma that is available
electronically in text and HTML formats. All issues will be converted
to this format for handling within the SPAR review process in any
case, so if you can help by doing this in advance it will greatly ease
the burden on the Core group.
- All reviews should be returned electronically by e-mail. It would
also help if each issue you raise is in a separate message (with the
text or HTML version attached or included) with the issue topic name
in the subject header. Use text in the third person so it can be
entered straight into the web pages.
- It is unlikely that detailed technical discussions can take place
specifically involving the SPAR Core Group during the development of
SPAR. Any such discussions should more properly be passed to one of the
many technical groups and pre-standards activities which are considering
similar matters in great detail. In some cases the SPAR Core Group
themselves will pass on the issues raised by reviewers to such special
interest groups for their consideration and further comment on options.
- You may also raise an issue within your own panel using the SPAR
e-mail aliases provided for the purpose. Do not include
spar-core@isi.edu in the exchange of discussions related to your
panel's review. Only the final result should be sent to the core
group.
- Please do not raise issues with too wide an e-mail audience.
arpi-all@isx.com, for example, is much too broad a mailing list
to raise SPAR issues.
SPAR Core Group Document Review Process and Issue Raising
Increment to SPAR Document
- Increments that are compatible with the current document that are not
the subject of immediate (1 day) issues raised by other core group
members will be incorporated into the document after the elapse of 1 day
from receipt.
- Core group members may subsequently raise informal issues on the
increment at any time and they can be handled in two ways:
- resolved informally by the increment proposer withdrawing or
modifying the increment in line with the informal issues raised,
- otherwise by being handled as normal by establishing the informal
issue as a formal issue.
Issue Handling
- Each core group members may hold their own issue information on-line
at their own site as described in the distributed issue handling process.
- Each core group member must watch for and take full responsibility for
gathering the notes for the issues they are responsible for handling.
- A core group member can pass the handling of an issue to another core
group member with their agreement, but otherwise retains responsibility.
- Any core group member can ask for notes to be added to an existing
issue or raise a new issue at any time.
- When the person responsible for an issue judges that the issue is
ready for resolution, and in any case before the identified "to be
resolve by" version is finalized, the person responsible will:
- ensure that the issue summary and any detailed issue page is up to
date and clear.
- ensure that all relevant input from core group members, panels, and
other commentators is included at an appropriate level (long e-mail is
inappropriate - this is anyway available in the e-mail archives at
http://www.isi.edu/isd/spar/admin.html
if we need to refer back to it).
- ensure that the options for resolution of the issue, if more than one,
are summarized or clear.
- add a recommendation for the resolution of the issue.
- e-mail spar-core@isi.edu to ask for the issue to be considered and
to see if a consensus is reached. Be sensitive to travel of core group
members, but seek to respond quickly to such calls. (It is
suggested this should be within 2 working days).
- The outcome of the call for resolution of the issue can be:
- issue is resolved, the resolution should be noted in the text of
the issue. The recommended changes to the SPAR document will be made.
- Issue resolution is premature, more information or input should be
sought, add a note that the attempt to resolve the issue did not lead to a
consensus, list the actions to get additional input, alter the "to be
resolved by" version if necessary.
- Disagreement that is unlikely to be resolved by further discussion.
This should be noted in the issue text. A formal vote may be
necessary to break such a deadlock in extreme cases! If so all positions
or votes should be noted in the issue text, and the majority view should
prevail - casting vote is with the technical lead for SPAR:-)
- After an issue has been resolved, the issue summary and detailed issue
page should be checked back into the central issue pages and removed
form the core group members distributed issue pages.
Issue management - and distributed sites.
All issues are available via the SPAR Home
Page Issues Section. However, some of the issue summaries and details
will be maintained at the web sites of those people responsible for
tracking the issue and for building notes relating to it.
For each issue there is a summary normally one or two paragraphs in
length. These are maintained centrally on the outstanding issues
list, or may be maintained at other sites for those handling the
issue. If they are held in a distributed way, a suitable index entry
is maintained in the SPAR Home Page Issues Section.
There may optionally be a more detailed page (and perhaps associated
information). If so this is kept as ISSUES/issue-xxxx.html. An index
to the more detailed entries available is kept on the SPAR Home Page
Issues Section.
When an issue is handled, a short description of the
outcome is written into the summary and it is passed to the central
site for incorporation into the Previous Issues list.
SPAR web management - and distributed sites.
URLs should be relative to ease the transitions when a web area is
archived or moved to another server.
Core Group members should seek to use a directory for their
distributed web pages that can stay for a long period and use a
suitable directory name such as spar or SPAR. It is recommended that
you have a directory in that called IMG for figures, etc. It is
recommended that you have a directory in that called ISSUES for
detailed issue entries.
Sample Web Pages
Page maintained by Austin Tate
(a.tate@ed.ac.uk),
Last updated: Fri Apr 28 14:35:19 2000