DARPA AFRL Planning Initiative
Shared Planning and Activity Representation
SPAR Home Page

Part of the DARPA/Air Force Research Laboratory (Rome) Planning Initiative (ARPI)

Documents | Remit | Process | Participants | Meetings | Admin | Resources

Documents and Presentations


Remit

To Core Group:
  1. To produce the specification of a representation for plans, processes and activities for use by technology-base and applications projects in DARPA, Air Force Research Laboratory (Rome) and beyond.
  2. To seek input from the technical and user communities to influence the specification.
  3. To communicate and promote the specification to its intended audience.
To each Panel Member:
  1. To make a presentation (in writing or at a suitable meeting) to the Core Group about requirements for plan representations as they are influenced by your area of interest.
  2. To respond to Request For Comment documents and submit a set of issues reflecting your area of interest to further the development of SPAR. In particular to consider if the SPAR model precludes R&D your community of specialist interest is engaged in.
  3. To review material as the representation evolves and track issues reflecting your area of interest.
  4. To provide a written summary of issues that could go into the document that will be prepared as part of this effort.
A web area stating the objectives of the ARPI Program Managers for SPAR, giving lists of requirements for the representation and classifications of those requirements is available here.

Process for Development

  1. The Core Group will merge existing plan ontology work into a good, solid core representation as a starting point and will present this at the November 1997 ARPI Workshop.
  2. Via three panels, the Core Group will seek input to the SPAR work, reviews of the representation proposed, and issues raised by it. The panels are:
    • User Requirements Panel.
    • Specialism Experts Panel.
    • Formalization Review Panel.
  3. Take lessons learned in 2 to refine 1, and repeat the process.
  4. Communicate the work in progress and the availability of the Representation to the potential user, technical and standards communities.
  5. Collect experience in the use of SPAR and use lessons learned to refine the representation.
  6. Publish report on the representation and experience gained.

Participants

Participants have been chosen to be familiar with the issues of plan representation and to be able to reflect specific concerns for their "constituency".

Note that an individual's initials is used to track issues relating to SPAR.

Initials Name Organization Representing
Core Group - e-mail spar-core@isi.edu
ATAustin TateAIAI, University of EdinburghTechnical Lead
BSBill SwartoutUSC/ISI 
KMKaren MyersSRI International 
TCTodd CarricoDARPA ALP Program 
Core Group Support - e-mail spar-core@isi.edu
TGTom GarveyDARPA ISO/SRI International)Government Representative
APAdam PeaseTeknowledgeCoordination with User Requirements Panel and Reference Object Model
SPSteve PolyakDAI, University of EdinburghCoordination with Specialism Experts Panel, Formalization Review Panel and Other Commentators
YGYolanda GilUSC/ISI 
User Requirements Panel - e-mail spar-users@isi.edu
BSBill SwartoutUSC/ISIJFACC
KMKaren MyersSRI InternationalJFACC
TCTodd CarricoDARPA ALP ProgramAITS, ALP
TGTom GarveyDARPA ISO/SRI InternationalACCM
YGYolanda GilUSC/ISIJFACC
CEChristopher ElsaesserMitreCOAA
Specialism Experts Panel - e-mail spar-special@isi.edu
APAdam PeaseTeknowledgeRelationship to OMWG CPR
BDBrian DrabbleCIRL, University of OregonQualitative Process Models
DLDDenise L. DraperRockwellUncertainty
DWDarrell WoelkMCCCollaborative Process Management and Workflow
JAJames AllenUniversity of RochesterMulti-modal user dialogue, planning in complex temporal and uncertain worlds
JLJintae LeeUniversity of HawaiiPIF and Process Handbook
LLLarry Laffertyvia ISX CorporationPerformance Issues
MVManuela VelosoCMUCase-based Plans
SPSteve PolyakDAI, University of EdinburghNIST PSL and Plan Design Rationale
SSSteve SmithCMUConstraint-based Scheduling
Formalization Review Panel - e-mail spar-formal@isi.edu
CMChris MenzelKBSI and Texas A& UniversityMFormal Models and IDEF Methods
DEDavid EtheringtonCIRL, University of OregonFormal Models wrt Scheduling and Constraints
JDJon DoyleMITFormal Models and Problem Solving Methods Representation
MGMicheal GruningerUniversity of TorontoFormal Models and TOVE Ontology
MUMike UscholdBoeingFormal Models and Enterprise Ontology
PHPat HayesUniversity of West FloridaFormal Models and Temporal Aspects
Extra Commentators - e-mail spar-interest@isi.edu
AMAzad MadniISTI 
DDDoug DyerDARPA 
DMDrew McDermottYale University 
GWGerhard WicklerDAI, University of Edinburgh 
JJJens JensenUSCINCPAC 
JFLJohn F. LemmerAFRL (Rome) 
NFNort FowlerAFRL (Rome) 
OLOra LassilaW3C and Nokia 
SAStuart AitkenAIAI, University of Edinburgh 
PJPeter JarvisAIAI, University of Edinburgh 
SKSubbarao KhambhampatiArizona State University 
All Participants - e-mail spar-all@isi.edu


Meetings

Index of Meetings Reports
  1. Core Group Kickoff Meeting - PRC, Arlington, VA - 24/25-Sep-97
    Report of meeting is available here.

  2. Meeting - USC/ISI, Marina del Rey, CA - 20-Oct-97

    Austin Tate, Bill Swartout, Yolanda Gil and Andre Valenté discussed the domain specific grammars and how they can plug in to SPAR representations. It was agreed that they should be considered more generally as plug in ontology extensions, with just one presentation style being a language grammar.

  3. Meeting - San Francisco - 3-Nov-97

    Austin Tate, Adam Pease and Craig Schlenoff (NIST PSL lead) discussed the details of SPAR entity attributes to prepare inputs to the SPAR Core Group on several outstanding design issues.

  4. Meeting - San Francisco - 4/6-Nov-97

    Report of meeting is available here.

  5. Meeting - Various - 1998

    Small group discussions to continue the development of the sentence level conceptual model for SPAR leading to Version 0.2.


SPAR Administration

A Page relating to adminstrative details of the SPAR project is available here. It contains:

Resources Links

This section gives pointers to recent related work on arriving at terminology and structure for models intended to allow shared re-usable descriptions of processes, activities, tasks and plans.

Standards Bodies and Languages

ARPI Plan Ontology Related Projects

Other Plan Ontology Related Projects

Related DARPA and other Applications Programs

ARPI Home Page
AIAI Page maintained by Austin Tate (a.tate@ed.ac.uk), Last updated: Wed Nov 19 12:53:07 2008
Please make contact if you have any comments on these pages or the SPAR Project.