Reviewer's Form


Paper ID: 
Title of paper: 
Author(s) of paper: 
Submission type (full/demo/position paper): 

Reviewer's name: (will be taken away when given to the author)

Please note that supervisors can not review their own students'
paper. It is also avoidable that a paper reviewed by personnel from
the same University, if possible.  

Overall evaluation based on the above submission type: (score insert
here) 

6 - Extremely good paper, recommended for best paper for PG DS 
5 - Excellent paper, strongly recommended 
4 - Strongly recommended 
3 - Recommended  
2 - fair 
1 - un-specified 

Recommendation for paper publication: (i.e. as a full, demo or
position paper. If you wish to recommend a full paper as a shorter
paper, i.e. a demo or position paper, please also indicate it here.)  

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
A summary of review: The score ranges from 1-5 and as illustrated below:

5 - excellent
4 - very good
3 - fair 
2 - weak
1 - poor

(A) Degree of originality:  (score 1-5)

(B) Significance of topic addressed: (score 1-5) 

(C) Technical quality: (score 1-5) 

(D) Readability and presentation: (score 1-5) 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall comments to the author(s): 


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Private comments to the PC (not open to the author):